ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> The Landlord Law Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: The Landlord Law BlogHomeless hostel too comfortable says VAT man
ADVERTISEMENTS
Reading the recent issue of a href="http://www.roofmagazine.org.uk/"Roof Magazine/a, I came across this utterly bonkers decision by the VAT authorities.br /br /Byker Housing Association has built a new 31 bed hostel for the homeless in Newcastle ? however the VAT authorities have deemed it to be a commercial building (i.e. a hotel) rather than a residential one - because it is too comfortable! This means that it becomes liable for VAT of £315,000 ? which will put Byker Bridge out of business. br /br /Under the VAT rules, hostels should be exempt from VAT if they are for a residential use, designed as a dwelling, or used for a relevant charitable purpose. Despite this, because the VAT office does not have a workable definition of a homeless persons hostel, and because the new hostel is quite nice, they are treating it as if it were a hotel for tax purposes. Even though the building was partly developed with Housing Corporation finance which is only available for non commercial ventures!br /br /Hopefully this decision will be set aside. Otherwise Byker Bridge will go out of business, there will be 1,500 per year more homeless on the streets of Newcastle, and it will have a knock on effect on other registered social landlords developing homeless hostelsFull post as published by The Landlord Law Blog on December 23, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Paedophile hostel ban criticised
Sex offender absconds from hostel
Hotelalternative: Im Jumbojet am Airport schlafen
Should hate-crime laws cover the homeless
Can helping homeless hurt them







