Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> International Extradition Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: International Extradition BlogExtradition from the Netherlands to the United States?Wesam al Delaema Update
A Dutch court, however, seems to have removed the last hurdle facing the United States in having Mr. al Delaema extradited.[1] His attorneys had argued that the United States does not have a right to try him, that he could be tortured, and that the United States? legal system ?cannot be trusted.?[2] The United States countered by assuring the court that he will be tried in federal court?not by a military commission?and that the United States would not be opposed to allowing to serve his sentence in the Netherlands if he is convicted.[3] Based on those assurances, the Dutch court stated that ?[t]here is not reason to believe that the U.S. authorities will not abide by the commitments they have given or ? deprive the suspect of his fundamental rights.?[4]
The Dutch court is relying on principles of comity in so ruling, expecting that the United States will abide by its representations. Any breach of those assurances, however, likely cannot be argued by Mr. al Delaema. A number of courts have concluded that objections to a violation of the extradition agreement can only be an affront to the surrendering country, not to the individual, and therefore ?the extradited individual ? can only raise those objections to the extradition process that the surrendering country might consider a breach of the extradition treaty.?[5] In other words, if the United States chose to violate those assurances, Mr. al Delaema could complain about the breach only if the Netherlands was likely to do so.
[1] Mike Corder, Dutch National Faces U.S. Terror Trial, AP (via Yahoo!), Dec. 19, 2006.
[2] Id.
[3] Id.
[4] Id.
[5] United States v. Baez, 349 F.3d 90, 92 (2d Cir. 2003) (quoting United States v. Diwan, 864 F.2d 715, 721 (11th Cir. 1983).
Full post as published by International Extradition Blog on December 20, 2006 (boomark / email).
Recall of TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count Sold in The United States and Puerto Rico
TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count One Lot Recalled in US and Puerto Rico
United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers
United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers
FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review
UPDATE 1: Caraco Digoxin Recall
Intuit
allegedly sent out a defective QuickBooks Pro update.
Mexican Vanilla Containing Coumarin
, FDA Issues Consumer Update

Computer hacker loses extradition appeal
Fourth Amendment no application in international extraditions
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
Colombia court halts extradition of paramilitary chief to US
Noriega challenges France extradition bid in US appeals court
DUTCH SAME-SEX COUPLES HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS DUTCH CARIBBEAN OPPOSITE-MARRIED COUPLES








