Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Karel's Legal Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Karel's Legal BlogDUTCH MAILBOX COMPANIES
By Karel.Frielink
It?s not merely a mailbox
According to the OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development), a tax haven (or offshore jurisdiction) is a jurisdiction which actively makes itself available for the avoidance of taxes which would otherwise be paid in a higher tax jurisdiction. There are more and less advanced offshore jurisdictions. The concessions and benefits may come in different forms. It may be, e.g., zero tax on receipt and distribution of dividends (holding companies in Cyprus, Denmark and the Netherlands) or favorable tax treatment through treaties and agreements with the investor?s home country (Cyprus, the Netherlands and Malta).
In its November 2006 report ?The Netherlands: A Tax Haven?‘, SOMO (?Stichting Onderzoek Multinationale Ondernemingen?; Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations) concludes that the Netherlands is a tax-haven. The Netherlands hosts nearly 20,000 so-called ?mailbox companies? primarily for fiscal reasons, which companies do not have a substantial commercial presence. What are mailbox companies?
For example, Netherlands-based companies or institutions whose shares are held directly or indirectly by non-residents, which specialize in raising funds outside the Netherlands and on-lending or investing them outside the Netherlands are mailbox companies. Such companies are not ?mailbox companies?, in the sense, that they, e.g., do not use office space in the Netherlands and have no activities whatsoever in the Netherlands. Mailbox companies are companies that have no substantive connection with the country of incorporation.
Karel Frielink
Attorney (Lawyer) / Partner
Full post as published by Karel's Legal Blog on February 25, 2008 (boomark / email).
Two Energy Companies Settle Whistleblower Qui Tam Suit
Two Energy Companies Settle Whistleblower Qui Tam Suit
Chemical Companies
alleging danger to people living near the plants.
Hedge Funds
alleging companies involved in mortgage fraud.
Laurin Maritime et al
Class Action Launched Against Companies Responsible for Mississippi Oil Spill
Google
alleging that companies who used internet advertising to sell mobile content have overpaid for keywords.
Mutual Funds
alleging financial companies breached ERISA act with employee 401k plan holders.

Dutch court to hear challenge against film criticizing Islam
Muslim nations condemn Dutch Koran film
A Dutch Company Blocks an Acquisition
Dutch court refuses to bar anti-Islam statements from far-right lawmaker
French Tax Authorities Recognize Dutch Same-Sex Marriage
Dutch Court Says MP Has Right To Free Speech, Refuses To Ban Anti-Koran Film







