ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Karel's Legal Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Karel's Legal Blog

DUTCH CARIBBEAN ANTI-MONEY-LAUNDERING REGULATIONS (I)

By Karel.Frielink

ADVERTISEMENTS

An overview

Important Netherlands Antilles anti-money-laundering regulations include the National Ordinance Penalization Money Laundering (?Landsverordening Strafbaarstelling Witwassen van Geld?, ?NOML?) which criminalizes money laundering, and the National Ordinance on the Reporting of Unusual Transactions (?Landsverordening Melding Ongebruikelijke Transacties?, ?MOT?). The latter requires anybody who offers financial services to report, without delay, any ?unusual transactions? to the Financial Intelligence Unit (?Meldpunt Ongebruikelijke Transacties?).

Non-legislative regulations, such as the Provisions and Guidelines on the Detection and Deterrence of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing for Credit Institutions (?Guidelines?), issued by the Central Bank of the Netherlands Antilles are also relevant. These state that the Netherlands Antilles is a member of the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (?FATF?) and the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (?CFATF?) and indicate that such membership is part of the genesis of its anti-money laundering efforts. For instance, Section 3 of the CFATF Recommendations states that countries should criminalize the aiding and abetting of serious offences.
 
Section 3 of the NOML states that a person shall be deemed guilty by default of the laundering of money if that person:

(a) acquires, has at his disposal or transfers money while at the time the money was acquired by him or became available to him, it would have been reasonable for him to have presumed that the same was derived from criminal acts; or

(b) for the purpose of gain, has at his disposal or transfers money while he reasonably may presume that the money has been derived from criminal acts.

In addition, Section 5 states that both legal entities and those individuals directing legal entities may be held criminally liable under Section 3 NOML.

Karel Frielink
Attorney (Lawyer) / Partner

Full post as published by Karel's Legal Blog on April 29, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0031 secs (from cache 10/31/26 02:15:30)