ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Rob Hyndman .com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Rob Hyndman .com

Bafflegabble from Rogers on iPhone pricing

By Rob Hyndman

ADVERTISEMENTS

Tris posts a disappointingly empty response from Rogers on the growing controversy over iPhone plan pricing. This one’s a gem: “The iPhone bundles were created to provide the best value to our customers. With respect to Rogers iPhone 3G pricing, we believe that the customer that wants this device wants to fully appreciate all that iPhone 3G has to offer so there?s a wide selection of high value price packages to meet the needs of Canadians. We believe that unlimited plans could end up costing customers more for what they don?t use.”

So, to summarize - we, the customers, are simply too stupid to make our own decisions about whether an unlimited plan is right for us, and Rogers is generously protecting us from our own inability to make an informed decision. That’s right, we’re smart enough to plow through the byzantine assortment of plans already available, but not quite clever enough to know whether an unlimited plan is right for us. And, apparently, not intelligent enough, once we’ve chosen an unlimited plan and learned that it’s ‘costing us more for what we don’t use’, to change our plan to the “high value” plan they think we should have chosen at the outset.

Here’s the reader’s digest version: providing an unlimited plan will, by comparison to the iPhone unlimited plans in other countries, show Rogers in such a greedy and unflattering light, that it simply can’t be done, and the company has chosen instead to put out this particular fire by resorting to a mind-numbing stream of meaningless corporate-speak. We’ve known since the iPhone was announced that it would be this way. And here we are.

I’ve made the point elsewhere and often - I like Rogers. But I’m growing weary of being fleeced by a (GSM) monopolist that day by day seems - well - greedy. And I’m growing very concerned that our wireless providers are simply getting in the way - fast, ubiquitous and affordable wireless will, I’m convinced, have a profound impact on national productivity. Could the lack of competition in our wireless markets be a growing danger? Between this and the lack of competition and innovation in wired broadband, I’m beginning to think that the structure of these markets is holding us back.

In any event, I’m now officially out of the iPhone market.

Similar Posts:
    None Found

Full post as published by Rob Hyndman .com on July 01, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0029 secs (from cache 10/31/26 05:08:28)