Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Seattle Trademark Lawyer
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Seattle Trademark LawyerWestern District Holds Cancellation is Not a Valid Independent Claim
By Michael Atkins
ADVERTISEMENTS
In Basel Action Network v. International Association of Electronics Recyclers, both parties are non-profit organizations that certify businesses that recycle electronics products.
In June 2010, Basel sued IAER for a declaratory judgment that its use of the terms “certified electronics recycler” and “electronics recycler” does not infringe IAER’s CERTIFIED ELECTRONICS RECYCLER certification mark. Basel also sought to cancel the CERTIFIED ELECTRONICS RECYCLE read more
Full post as published by Seattle Trademark Lawyer on December 15, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Dependent Claim Improperly Held Obvious (When Independent is Nonobvious)
Federal Western District Court Dismisses Bad Faith Case on Statute of Limitations Grounds
Patentee could not rebut presumption of estoppel; noninfringement finding affirmed








