Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep Links
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep LinksViacom's Statement on YouTube User Data Controversy
By Kurt Opsahl
Viacom released the following statement today in response to the YouTube user data controversy (first reported on this blog):
"It is unfortunate that we have been compelled to go to court to protect Viacom's rights and the rights of the artists who work with and depend on us. YouTube and Google have put us in this position by continuing to defend their illegal and irresponsible conduct and profiting from copyright infringement, when they could be implementing the safe and legal user generated content experience they promise.
The Court's recent decision has triggered concern about what information will be disclosed and how it will be used. Viacom has not asked for and will not be obtaining any personally identifiable information of any user. Any information that we or our outside advisors obtain -- which will not include personally identifiable information -- will be used exclusively for the purpose of proving our case against You Tube and Google, will be handled subject to a court protective order and in a highly confidential manner.
In addition, the New York Times reported that:
Google and Viacom said they had had discussions about ways to ensure the data is further protected to assure anonymity.
?We are disappointed the court granted Viacom?s overreaching demand for viewing history,? Catherine Lacavera, Google?s senior litigation counsel, said in a statement. ?We are asking Viacom to respect users? privacy and allow us to anonymize the logs before producing them under the court?s order.?
Michael Fricklas, Viacom?s general counsel said: ?We are investigating techniques, including anonymization, to enhance the security of information that will be produced.?
Mr. Fricklas added that Viacom would not have direct access to the information Google produces, and that its use would be strictly limited. Viacom would not, for example, be able to chase down users who illegally posted clips from ?The Colbert Report? on YouTube.
?The information that is produced by Google is going to be limited to outside advisers who can use it solely for the purpose of enforcing our rights against YouTube and Google,? Mr. Fricklas said. ?I can unequivocally state that we will not use any of this information to enforce rights against end users.?
It is encouraging to see that both Viacom and Google are responding to the important privacy interest raised by the court's order. We plan to continue discussions with the parties on ways to protect the privacy of the YouTube users and ensure that their rights under the Video Privacy Protection Act are given effect.
Full post as published by Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep Links on July 03, 2008 (boomark / email).
How to Skirt H-1B Regulations
Senator reacts to YouTube video
Probation User Fees
Clark County Council pays $1.1 million settlement after misappropriating funds.
T-mobile data plans, T-mobile, t-mobile phones
T-Mobile Faces Class Action over Limited Unlimited Data Plans
AT&T Faces Class Action over Excessive Data Usage Charges
AT&T Faces Class Action over Excessive Data Usage Charges
Seroquel
Data on Diabetes Buried
Nursing Home Abuse
New Data Made Public
Xolair
FDA Issues Early Communication over Safety Data

Fact Checking Viacom's New Statement on Privacy and YouTube
Viacom, YouTube, and the Dangerous Assembly of Facts
Slaw Post: Viacom Vying for Your YouTube User Records
How Viacom Ambushed YouTube and You - Updated
Can Phorm Be Trusted to Track User Clicks







