Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Trademark Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Trademark BlogText of Io v Veoh DMCA Ruling and EFF Commentary
By Marty Schwimmer
EFF: "Required Reading for "User-Generated Content" Sites":
In an important ruling handed down yesterday, a federal district court threw out a copyright infringement suit brought by adult video producer Io Group against Veoh, concluding that the video hosting site qualifies for the DMCA safe harbor. The ruling should be required reading for the executives of every "Web 2.0" business that relies on "user-generated content."Veoh, like YouTube, is a streaming video site that hosts videos uploaded by users. Io Group sued Veoh in 2006 after finding clips from 10 of its copyrighted adult films on the Veoh site. So far, this is a familiar story -- user-generated content site gets sued by copyright owner for naughty uploading habits of users (see, e.g., lawsuits against MySpace, iMeem, YouTube, Redlasso, Hi5, Multiply, Stage6, MP3tunes, Scribd, Usenet.com, Bolt, and Grouper). But this is the first case to get to a final ruling, and it's a total victory for Veoh.
Full post as published by Trademark Blog on August 29, 2008 (boomark / email).
Katrina Victims See Justice, Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Katrina Victims See Justice Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Timberland
Unsolicited Text Messages Cost Company $7 Million
T-Mobile USA Inc.
allegedly charged customers for unsolicited text messages.

Stop the Presses: Io Groups v. Veoh might not be a home run for YouTube
Ruling in Veoh Case Could Mean Blue Skies Ahead for YouTube
Required Reading for "User-Generated Content" Sites: Io Group v. Veoh
Io v. Veoh: Harmful to YouTube







