ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Seattle Trademark Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Seattle Trademark Lawyer

No Temporary Restraining Order Enjoining Use of COMMON SENSE

By Michael Atkins

ADVERTISEMENTS

When things are slow in Seattle…

…STL reports on trademark issues elsewhere. That’s what I’ve been doing for the last couple of days.

Here’s a new trademark decision from the Northern District of California. Plaintiff Common Sense Media, Inc., applied for a temporary restraining order against defendant Common Sense Issues, Inc., based on plaintiff’s allegations that defendant is infringing its registered trademarks, COMMON SENSE MEDIA and COMMON SENSE MEDIA and Design. In particular, plaintiff asked the court to temporarily restrain defendant from using its COMMON SENSE ISSUES mark or any similar designation.

On Jan. 25, Judge Claudia Wilken denied plaintiff’s application. She found that “CSM has not made a sufficient showing of likely success on the merits of its claims and of the immediate threat of irreparable harm to justify granting the relief it seeks. Although ‘Common Sense Issues’ is similar to CSM’s trademarks, the phrase, ‘common sense’ is not unique, and the field of registered trademarks including the phrase is crowded. Many of these marks consist of the phrase, ‘common sense’ followed by a generic descriptive word similar to the word, ‘issues.’”

The court also found “it does not appear that the services provided by CSM and CSI are so closely related that the public would reasonably believe they come from the same source. CSM is a nonpartisan organization that provides information services related to children and the media. CSI is a political action group that provides voters with information on the positions of presidential candidates with respect to particular issues. While CSM argues that nothing would prevent CSI in the future from providing information on issues related to children and the media, this possibility cannot serve as the basis for a present claim of trademark infringement.”

Finally, the court concluded plaintiff had not shown it would suffer irreparable harm if the requested temporary restraining order did not issue.

The case cite is Common Sense Media, Inc. v. Common Sense Issues, Inc., 2008 WL 220120, No. 08-0155 (N.D. Calif.).

Full post as published by Seattle Trademark Lawyer on January 30, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 10/31/26 09:09:54)