ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IP Blawg
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IP BlawgSupreme Court Steps On The Gas To Review Obviousness
By Farella Braun + Martel LLP
ADVERTISEMENTS
In a case with huge implications for both patent prosecutors and litigators, the Supreme Court has granted KSR?s petition for certiorari and is prepared to address basic questions of patentability that have not been considered by the Court since 1966, before the Federal Circuit was even formed. The dispute in KSR v. Teleflex (Supreme Court 2006) centers on patent claims for a car gas pedal design, and KSR?s writ presented the following question:Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding read more
Full post as published by IP Blawg on June 28, 2006 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

New L&C Law Scholarship: Creativity, Innovation, and Obviousness
Hindsight Bias in Obviousness Determinations
Obviousness After KSR - The U.S. Patent Offices New Published Examination Guidelines
KSR Update: Withstanding the Obviousness Challenge
Charles Lawson - Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws








