ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Trademark Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Trademark Blog

This Is How We Do Summary Judgement For Music Copyright

By Marty Schwimmer

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Game, featuring Fifty Cent, released "How We Do" in 2005. Plaintiffs registered copyright for their song 'Elevator" in 2002. Both songs are described as contemporary hip hop songs. Both songs' choruses contain the phrase "this is how we do" four times, interspersed with other lines, set to a similar rhythm.

A copyright plaintiff must establish that defendant had access to plaintiff's work, and that the works are substantially similar. On summary judgement, a claim of access must be supported with 'significant affirmative and probative evidence' showing that the 'alleged infringer had a reasonable possibility - not simply a bare possibility - of hearing the prior work; access cannot be based on mere speculation or conjecture.' "Access through third parties connected to both a plaintiff and a defendant may be sufficient to prove a defendant's access to a plaintiff's work."

Here, one of the plaintiff's knew a producer who knew the defendant writers. He 'probably' played and delivered copies of his song to the producer (producer was a customer at the Sam Ash store where plaintiff worked). The producer and the writers gave declarations that the producer didn't 'transmit' the song to them (but apparently the declarations weren't emphatic enough). Court held that material facts were in dispute as to access.

As to whether probative similarity could be used to establish access, the dueling music experts' disagreements as to the uniqueness of the chorus were sufficient to defeat summary judgment for both sides.

As to substantial similarity, the 'this is how we do' phrase was prominent enough in both songs, such that a jury could conclude that the songs are substantially similar.

As to defendant's allegations of independent creation, whether that in fact was the case 'involves factual issues that are not susceptible of summary judgment.'

Parties' motions for summary judgment denied.

decision lessem the game this is how we

Full post as published by Trademark Blog on February 09, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.003 secs (from cache 10/31/26 07:22:57)