Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Madisonian.net
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Madisonian.netStanford Law in Politics, Again?
By Mike Madison
Stanford lawprof Larry Lessig is thinking of running for Congress. Should he do it? Is this the most effective way to leverage his anti-corruption message?
I believe that the last time a brilliant young Stanford law faculty member ran for Congress, he ended up serving several (non-sequential) terms. Professor Tom Campbell eventually ran for the U.S. Senate from California and lost. He’s now Dean of the Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley.
Long before Tom Cambell, there was Professor Byron Sher, who served in the California Assembly from 1980 to 1996 and the State Senate from 1996 to 2004.
I had the great pleasure of being taught by both men.
Additional thoughts (added after the post above): Around the blogosphere, I’ve noticed connections being made between Lessig’s announcement and the recent death of Tom Lantos, Member of Congress for the 12th District. The 12th, of course, would be the seat that Lessig would pursue, and it’s Lantos’s mantle as the righteously independent pol that Lessig would wear. But Lantos was originally elected to represent the old 11th District, and as a Peninsula native I always regarded him as better suited to the moderately liberal and slightly more Democratic San Mateo County, which formed the core of the old 11th, than to the moderately conservative and slightly more Republican northern Santa Clara County, which was the core of the old 12th.
My sensibilities, however, were formed before redistricting. The current 12th has much in common geographically with the old 11th (thus Lantos’s switch). But redistricting or no, the 12th has a history of officeholders known at least as much for their colorful and provocative positions (and sometimes, personalities) as for their effectiveness, and that history that long predates Tom Lantos. Tom Campbell was characterized as smartest member of Congress and too smart, perhaps, for his own (and his constituents’) political good. Pete McCloskey is the best-known holder of the 12th seat — as a Republican opposing the Vietnam War, for his challenge to Richard Nixon in the 1972 Republican primaries, and for his all-around pugnaciousness. There was Ed Zschau, also a brilliant guy, but perhaps the blandest personality ever to represent Palo Alto. And after Zschau and before Campbell there was Ernie Konnyu, whose name alone suggests what a forgettable figure he should be. Whose mantle really comes with this seat? Lantos is/was the only Democrat in this group. If Lessig runs, and if he wins, he inherits quite the diverse tradition!
Technorati Tags: lessig for congress, tom lantos, tom campbell
Full post as published by Madisonian.net on February 20, 2008 (boomark / email).
Office Politics
Ramsey County pays two deputies $750,000 settlement after being placed in dead end jobs.

Conference Announcement: Legal Futures at Stanford
Stanford Engineering Tries its Hand at OCW
AALS Mid-Year Meeting: Regime Politics and the Roberts Court:
Last Free Culture lecture, first thought about what to do about political corruption
In commentary available online at FindLawHow Appealing








