Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IPKat
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IPKatModernisation and consolidation of the UK trade marks rules
By Jeremy
A notice posted on the UK IPO website mentions that the Trade Marks Rules 2000 have been amended seven times since they came into force, resulting in some unnecessary duplication and possible causes of confusion. The UK IPO plans to produce a new consolidated edition of the Rules, incorporating numerous changes. This consolidation has four purposes:* consolidation of existing changes to the Trade Marks Rules 2000 in order to increase accessibility and remove existing duplication, inconsistency and possible confusion;UK IPO wants to receive the widest possible range of views on the proposals, which you can read as a PDF Modernisation and consolidation of the Trade marks rules (442Kb) or as a Word document Modernisation and consolidation of the Trade marks rules (3.87Mb).* bringing the UK fully into line with international best practice and enabling ratification of the Singapore Treaty;
* making the tribunal system more flexible, efficient and proportionate;
* introducing business changes so as to increase the speed and efficiency of processes and reduce costs.
The deadline for responses to this consultation is 26 May 2008, by which time any post-INTA Meeting hangovers should have cleared. Comments may be sent by email, fax or post to Trade Mark Rules Consultation, Room 2 R20, UK Intellectual Property Office, Concept House, Cardiff Road, Newport NP10 8QQ (email consultation@ipo.gov.uk). The IPKat is sad that there are no prizes for the best responses. Merpel says, I like that bit about the previous changes "resulting in some unnecessary duplication": this is to be contrasted, presumably, with "necessary duplication" ...
Full post as published by IPKat on March 05, 2008 (boomark / email).
Trade Secrets
Former execs are hit with doctrine of inevitable disclosure.
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Trade Secrets
Razorsight agreed to pay $4.5 million settlement in infringement lawsuit.
Newspaper Publisher
Star Tribune must pay St. Paul Pioneer Press a $3.8 million trade secrets act violations settlement.

New Trade Marks Office practice to World and Land marks
Blawg of the Day -- Australian Trade Marks Law Blog
Examination of Three-dimensional Marks by Wang Ze









