Intellectual Property Law

The Internet Archive Protects Privacy for Libraries

By Deven Desai

Wired reports that the FBI subpoenaed the Internet Archive and demanded that Brewster Kahle (the Archive?s founder) provide records about one of the library’s registered users, asking for the user’s name, address and activity on the site. The FBI used a National Security Letter (example) to make the request. As Wired explains this type of letter does not require judge?s review before issuing it and often (almost always) has a gag order ?forbidding the recipient from ever speaking of the subpoena, except to a lawyer.? The Archive, EFF, and the ACLU went to court and had the subpoena quashed.

As I argue in Property, Persona, and Preservation, given that our information is more and more technologically mediated, we need better systems to preserve our information. This case raises a related issue of once preserved what can be done with the information. Here, the Archive is preserving the information and then as a library allowing people to use that information. But because of the method of access, the FBI was able to ask for great detail about who looked at what information and when. Julie Cohen?s A Right to Read Anonymously: A Closer Look at “Copyright Management” In Cyberspace offers an explanation as to why the Archive?s win is so important. In short, reading anonymously involves identity of the reader and how we foster ?freedom of thought and expression.?

In addition, the Wired article points out that despite the settlement the details of what was sought for example, the ?kind of information the target was looking at or uploading — such as animal rights information or Muslim literature? were kept secret. There may be reason for such secrecy. Still, when Congressional audits show that ?hundreds of thousands of NSLs? have been issued, the use has not been tracked, the FBI ?can only estimate how many NSLs it has issued,? each time an NSL has been challenged, it has lost (only three times according to the article), but one needs the help of a major public interest law group to fight the subpoena, something is wrong.

One disturbing thing is that no one knows exactly how these NSLs are being used or managed or if they do, they can?t talk about it. That situation reminds me of the private military context where the government also had little sense of how many and under what terms the PMCs were used. In other words, lack of oversight often leads to abuse, but then many know that, right? Another problem is that again like the PMC context, it seems quite difficult to have any sunshine fall upon this process. Why not have a judge look at such a letter? It seems the information is not going anywhere. Quite the opposite; remember it is preserved.

There is more to say on secrecy but for now I recommend Secrecy: The American Experience by Daniel Patrick Moynihan. I think I have recommended it before and probably Patrick O?Donnell has offered other books on the topic (which is always welcome). But as it is on my mind and an excellent look at how secrecy can help and harm a fight against whomever our enemies may be, I offer it again.

No Tags

Full post as published by Madisonian.net on May 08, 2008 (boomark / email).