ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> The Trade Secrets Vault

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: The Trade Secrets Vault

THE IDENTIFICATION ISSUE IN TRADE SECRET LITIGATION

ADVERTISEMENTS
8/26/2008 Legal Intelligencer Darin W. Snyder and David S. Almeling Trade secret litigation presents a unique issue in intellectual property litigation. With all other types of intellectual property, the subject matter is identified in publicly available material -- a registered copyright or trademark, an issued patent or a publicly available product. Trade secrets, by definition, are not publicly available or publicly defined. Accordingly, an issue in all trade secret cases is that plaintiffs must identify their alleged trade secrets. Yet there is no consensus about when or how plaintiffs must identify their trade secrets. Courts are, however, increasingly requiring plaintiffs to identify with particularity each allegedly misappropriated trade secret during the early stages of discovery. This trend helps litigants to focus their dispute and courts to resolve the litigants' conflict. Plaintiffs often assert that there is no way to identify each trade secret before they conduct discovery. They also often argue that they need not identify the allegedly misappropriated trade secrets because defendants 'know what they took.' Neither of these arguments is persuasive because plaintiffs must possess -- before filing suit and long before any discovery -- a good-faith basis for alleging that they possess a trade secret that has been misappropriated. Even when they acknowledge their duty to identify the trade secrets, plaintiffs often want to keep their options open by delaying identification for as long as possible and by drafting their identification as expansively as possible. They argue that discovery is broad and should not be cabined by when or how they identify their trade secrets. Defendants, conversely, often want plaintiffs' identification to be as early and precise as possible. They maintain that such identification assists the court in framing the scope of the litigation in general and discovery in particular, enables defendants to prepare their defenses, and prevents meritless suits from progressing to the burdensome discovery stage.

Full post as published by The Trade Secrets Vault on September 06, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0034 secs (from cache 10/31/26 05:05:54)