ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> The Trade Secrets Vault

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: The Trade Secrets Vault

ENCOURAGING 3RD PARTY TO USE TRADE SECRETS DID NOT VIOLATE CUTSA

ADVERTISEMENTS
The Connecticut Law Tribune Vol 13, No. 53 (2007) A plaintiff that did not allege that the defendant itself disclosed or used trade secrets, only that the defendant encouraged, aided or abetted a third-party to use trade secrets, failed to allege a violation of CUTSA, the Connecticut Uniform Trade Secrets Act, C.G.S. §35-51(b). Plaintiff Control Module designs and markets products that track time and attendance, access and inventory. Timothy Morello, the plaintiff's vice president of product engineering, was responsible for developing a 'stand alone terminal' at the request of a potential customer, defendant Data Management. The 'stand alone terminal' was designed to track worker time and attendance, using software developed by Data Management. The plaintiff designed and demonstrated stand alone terminals in December 2003 and February 2004, but Data Management did not purchase them. Instead, Data Management's president allegedly offered Timothy Morello a job as chief technology officer in March 2004. Afterward, Data Management's president allegedly met with Morello and informed him, 'if you build it, I will buy it.' Morello and a senior design engineer who worked for the plaintiff formed a business called Xipher Technologies LLC in September 2004. Defendant Data Management purchased Xipher's data collection machines, which allegedly compete with the plaintiff's products. The plaintiff sued and alleged that Data Management violated the Connecticut Uniform Trade Secrets Act. The court granted the defendants' motion to strike the CUTSA count. The plaintiff's complaint did not allege that Data Management itself obtained and disclosed trade secrets, only that it encouraged, aided and abetted the use of trade secrets by a third party, Xipher. Encouraging, aiding and abetting are not included in the definition of 'misappropriation' in CUTSA. Control Module Inc. v. Data Management Inc.U.S. District Court (Doc. No. 3:07CV00475)Thompson, J. ? Dec. 10, 2007 ? 10 pages.Full text available at www.ctlawtribune.com

Full post as published by The Trade Secrets Vault on January 13, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 10/31/26 06:10:56)