Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> ISinIP
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: ISinIPDismissive of the Fact of Being Reasonably Willful.
By thomason
What chance would you give a Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss a claim of willfulness? That motion won in Abbott Labs. v. Sandoz, (N.D. Ill. 12/4/2007). This suit was later-filed over infringement by a generic substitute. In prior suits over the same patent, the Federal Circuit had vacated a preliminary injunction due to “substantial questions” about validity.
The later-filed suit against Sandoz included a count for willfulness, which prompted a motion to dismiss that count. The District Court starts from the propositions that willfulness is a “question of fact” and that on motion to dismiss the allegations must be taken as true as against the moving party defendant. To me, that cut off the chances to get a 12(b)(6) dismissal.
Wrong again Rumpole! Based on the Seagate ruling by the CAFC, the standard for willful infringement is “objective” reasonableness about whether the conduct would infringe. Sandoz pointed to the earlier opinion that vacated injunction based on validity concerns. On that basis, Sandoz argued its launch of the generic was objectively reasonable, since the patent might prove invalid as had been contended. The Judge agreed, and dismissed the case.
While “objective” suggests a matter that may be assessed by a Court more than proven thorough by evidence, for a fact question of reasonableness to be dismissed at the outset was a surprise. No wonder trolls love this land.
Full post as published by ISinIP on December 07, 2007 (boomark / email).
Around the web, September 16
Some commentators were dismissive of fears that NYC would cede financial market leadership to London, not so easy to be dismissive now [NYT] "Hedge funds'll be our undoing, they're unregulated" -- but it turned out boring old regulated firms...
Download of the Week
The Download of the Week is When is a Willful Breach 'Willful'? A Puzzle and Two Different Economic Solutions by Richard Craswell. Here is the abstract: Liability for breach of contract is often described as a form of strict liability,...
Exemplary Damages/Willful Infringement A German Perspective
The following is excerpted from a November 4, 2005 presentation by Dr. Frank-Erich Hufnagel, LLM of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer: Damage Calculation in German Law No subjective element in damage calculation: A willful infringer does not pay more damages Damages as...
The Federal Circuit Raises The Standard For Willful Infringement And Enhanced Damages
Ali Dhanani writes in the February 2008 Intellectual Property Report (Volume 5, Issue 73) from Baker Botts L.L.P., an article entitled, "In The Wake Of In re Seagate Technology, LLC: The Federal Circuit Raises The Standard For Willful Infringement And...
Willful
Monday, the Supreme Court snubbed certiorari for the CAFC en banc Seagate decision that practically eviscerated willful patent infringement. Nor reason was given. To seek enhanced damages, the Seagate standard requires that a patent holder prove that an infringer was "objectively reckless" in knowingly infringing a patent...
For The Record . . .
Hunter writes (Let me give credit to Oliver Willis for a shrewd reaction to the PA results ("Yes, Clinton won. Doesnt matter in the grand scheme of things.") Calm and cool is the approach for Obama and his supporters imo...









