Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Threat Level
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Threat LevelCourt Rules Breach Victims Not Entitled to Restitution
By Kim Zetter
A federal judge has ruled that victims whose bank card numbers were stolen in a data breach are not entitled to sue if their losses were already reimbursed. Only customers who weren’t reimbursed for fraudulent charges may sue.
The case involves the 2007-2008 breach of the Hannaford Bros. supermarket chain that involved 4.2 million credit and debit card numbers being exposed to hackers. Of these, about 1,800 account numbers are known to have been used for fraudulent purchases.
Consumers filed civil suits against the supermarket chain in several states for failing to properly secure their data. The cases were consolidated into a single case in Maine, where U.S. District Judge D. Brock Hornby tossed out all of the complaints except one, according to the Associated Press. The latter involves a Vermont woman who was never reimbursed for her losses.
A Maine law covering breaches allows consumers to recover damages if the merchant’s negligence caused a direct loss to the consumer’s account.
But Judge Hornby noted in his decision that, per the law, the merchant is liable for the loss only when its negligence “causes an unreimbursed fraudulent charge or debit against a customer’s account.” He added that “collateral consequences” are not covered under the state law.
Full post as published by Threat Level on May 13, 2009 (boomark / email).
Torts
Introduction to Torts
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Katrina Victims See Justice, Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Katrina Victims See Justice Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Mark Eagleson
$63,725 restitution settles fraud lawsuit.
Katrina Flood Victims Agree $20 Million Settlement
Katrina Flood Victims Agree $20 Million Settlement
Consumer Funding
BlueHippo Funding agrees to set up $5 million restitution fund after modifying its computer sales program.
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.
allegedly failed to give policyholders discounted rates to which they were entitled.

Restitution Payments to be Made Before Court Fines or Other Penalties
Second Circuit Rejects Challenge to Restitution Order On Grounds of Victims' "Unclean Hands"
Internal Investigation Costs as Restitution
Ind. Decisions - Supreme Court rules on restitution and ability to pay








