ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IMPACT

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: IMPACT

Clash of the Titans

ADVERTISEMENTS

The longstanding rivalry between media giants Rupert Murdoch and Richard Branson has taken another turn this week, as Murdoch-owned company Gemstar embarks on patent litigation proceedings in the High Court against Virgin Media. Gemstar is a US TV listings business that is partly owned by News Corporation, and the litigation centres around three European patents that Gemstar claims are infringed by Virgin Media: EP0969662, EP1377049, and EP1613066.

The patent claims relate to techniques for providing interactive program guides (IPGs) and for handling recordings from IPGs.

In a Gemstar press release, Samir Armaly, executive vice president, intellectual property and licensing,  was quoted as saying:

"We have worked diligently to license Virgin Media for their distribution of various set-top boxes that contain IPGs covered by our patents, but negotiations did not lead to a resolution. The substantial value of our European patent portfolio has been recognized by leading service providers as well as leading consumer electronics manufacturers in the UK and throughout Europe. While we would have preferred to reach a commercial solution with Virgin Media, we ultimately have a responsibility to our shareholders, licensees, and other stakeholders to protect the value of our intellectual property"

Virgin Media have apparently retorted:

"We are confident the courts will see Gemstar's action for what it is: a piece of flagrant opportunism. We have been advised by our external counsel that the case is without merit and we will defend it vigorously"

See, for example, the article in The Independent.

Both parties seem equally confident about their respective positions, however, it appears that the validity of the patents may be open to attack, and, as IPKat quite rightly points out, ultimately the outcome will depend upon what the patents can validly claim and how far the parties want to take the matter.

 


 

 

The Independent

Full post as published by IMPACT on January 25, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 10/31/26 11:45:37)