ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Indiana Blogs -> Indiana Barrister

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Indiana

: Indiana Barrister

YOU CALL THIS AN ARGUMENT?

By Abdul Hakim-Shabazz

ADVERTISEMENTS

Tonight is the City-County Council?s Public Safety Committee?s hearing on an ordinance that will transfer control of the Metropolitan Police Department from Sheriff Frank Anderson to Mayor Greg Ballard. Opponents plan to show up and make the following four arguments.

It lowers accountability in public safety by having two appointed officials in charge as opposed to one elected official. It takes public input out of public safety because we as the Indianapolis community will no longer vote on who is responsible for IMPD. It will cost money to move IMPD to the Mayor’s office, which could be spent on actually enhancing public safety. We already voted on who should run IMPD in the Sheriff’s last election. Crime decreased significantly once the Sheriff had control of IMPD.

Let?s walk through these.

1. It lowers accountability in public safety by having two appointed officials in charge as opposed to one elected official. There will be one person in charge of the Police Department, The Mayor.
2. It takes public input out of public safety because we as the Indianapolis community will no longer vote on who is responsible for IMPD. Yes the public will be able to vote on who is responsible for IMPD, he?s called the Mayor.
3. It will cost money to move IMPD to the Mayor’s office, which could be spent on actually enhancing public safety. Any transition costs will be nominal. Actually the taxpayers will save money because that?s less hours Kevin Murray, the Sheriff?s attorney, will get to bill.
4. We already voted on who should run IMPD in the Sheriff’s last election. IMPD didn?t even exist when Frank was re-elected.
5. Crime decreased significantly once the Sheriff had control of IMPD. Whatever! Actually crime has gone up since Frank was elected Sheriff, Don’t believe me, click here.

The sad thing is that there are some philosophical arguments you can debate for the Sheriff to be in charge of law enforcement, however if this is the best that the people who want to keep Frank in power can make, I feel for them.

Full post as published by Indiana Barrister on January 31, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 10/31/26 06:58:53)