Home -> Law Blog Directory -> In-House Counsel Blogs -> Law Department Management
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
In-House Counsel
: Law Department ManagementThree reasons why PDAs create compulsive users
By Rees Morrison
The Economist, April 12, 2008, at 8, sketches three addictive features of Blackberry use (or any PD). Since I have turned to the theme of destructive PDA-fixation before (See my post posts of April 3, 2005: productivity increases from PDAs, July 14, 2005: diminished productivity; June 5, 2006: workplace stress caused by them; Oct. 19, 2005 on telecommuters and PDAs; and Dec. 16, 2007: competing for attention against a Blackberry.) I mention each of them below.
Random reinforcement lures us on because every now and then among the dross there is gold. Second, the illusion that more information always leads us to better decisions means that we keep reading for that extra fillip of insight. The third reason is impression management, because we want our superiors to know that we are ever vigilant, never sleeping or on holiday. The hook slips further into the throat.
Obsessive use also engenders multi-tasking, or at least multi-something, which diminishes productivity (See my post of Feb. 8, 2008: five references to multi-tasking.).
Full post as published by Law Department Management on April 13, 2008 (boomark / email).
DePuy Metal Hip Replacement
alleging defective product recall of ASR hip implant for health reasons.
FenPhen
Serious Heart Problems Found In Ex-Users
Tollway I-Pass
alleging that users were sent erroneous fines
Requip
alleging behavior urges users to gamble, shop, and eat compulsively.

Studies Indicate That Stress Worsens Obsessive Compulsive Behaviors
PDAs Trump Spouses in the Bedroom
Used Smartphones and PDAs for Sale on eBay Reveal Massive Volume of Sensitive Data
Reasons Windows Users DON'T Switch to Macs
Compulsive Gambling and Mirapex Verdict $8.2 Million







