Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Health Law Blogs -> Physician Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Health Law
: Physician LawPennsylvania Qui Tam Case Highlights Dangers in Physician/Hospital Arrangements
By Todd A. Rodriguez
A recent whistleblower case out of the federal 3rd Circuit in Pennsylvania highlights some of the dangers in not properly documenting financial relationships between physicians and hospitals. Specifically, in US ex. rel. Kosenske v. Carlisle HMA, Inc., a Qui Tam lawsuit brought by the former member of an anesthesia group, the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a US District Court's summary judgment in favor of the defendant hospital and anesthesia group.
The anesthesia group in question had a written exclusive contract with the hospital for anesthesia services but, subsequent to entering into the exclusive agreement, began providing pain management services at the hospital's freestanding pain center. The hospital did not charge the anesthesia group rent for use of the space in the pain center and the qui tam relator claimed that the arrangements failed to meet the Stark exception for personal service arrangements (and therefore that claims for services referred by the anesthesia group's physicians to the hospital were in violation of the federal False Claim Act).
The Appeals Court found that the arrangement between the hospital and the anesthesia group implicated the Stark prohibitions because the anesthesia group received remuneration from the hospital in the form of, among other things, free rent and administrative services, and because the pain physicians referred patients to the hospital for diagnostic testing and other Stark services. The Court further found that the arrangement did not satisfy the Stark personal service exception because, among other things, the exclusive contract did not contemplate the pain management services when it was originally signed and it was not subsequently amended to address the pain management services. The case was remanded to the District Court for further proceedings.
What should physicians take away from this case?
(1) If you have a financial relationship of any kind with your hospital, it should be reflected in a signed written agreement;
(2) Make sure your agreements with your hospital meet an applicable Stark exception; and
(3) Regularly review and update your agreements to be sure they are in effect and accurately reflect the terms of the relationship.
Full post as published by Physician Law on March 25, 2009 (boomark / email).
Living Wills and Powers of Attorney
Laws effecting the elderly
Pennsylvania Employment Law
alleged violations of Pennsylvania labor laws including discrimination, harassment and overtime pay.
Hospital Malpractice
Corning Hospital agrees to $2.4 million medical negligence settlement after a baby was born with brain damage.
Hospital Staph
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital pays British actress Leslie Ash $10 million settlement after contracting the dangerous infection.
American Corrective Counseling Services to Pay $2.55 Million In Pennsylvania Class Action
American Corrective Counseling Services to Pay $2.55 Million In Pennsylvania Class Action
Pennsylvania Juvenille Detention
Judges Face Class Action
1,800 Vets at Risk for HIV, Hepatitis Through VA Hospital
1,800 Vets at Risk for HIV, Hepatitis Through VA Hospital

Physician Recruitment: Recruited Doc Bites Group in Arkansas.
HCQIA IMMUNITY CAN APPLY TO PEER REVIEW OF PRIVATE PHYSICIAN CONDUCT.
Physician Community Needs Assessments:Lies, Damn Lies and StatisticsPart I of II.
Case Law Update: One Year Statute of Limitations for Physicians Employed by Municipal Corporations
CMS Gives Qualified "OK" To Hospital Covering Cost Of Customized EHR Software For Physicians' Use
Case Law Update: Physicians Breach of Contract








