Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Health Law Blogs -> HIPAA Health Law & Technology
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Health Law
: HIPAA Health Law & TechnologyHIPAA Paranoia Strikes Deep Among Healthcare Providers
By Helen Oscislawski
Hospitals, physician practices and other healthcare providers continue to misunderstand patients' rights to their own records years after HIPAA's privacy rule took effect. The Los Angeles Times reported on July 27 that the California Medical Board receives many complaints from patients about trouble accessing medical records from doctors:
Candis Cohen, a spokeswoman for the board, says physicians and their office staffs frequently confuse details of the HIPAA privacy law and, even with the best intentions of protecting patients' privacy rights and complying with the law, deny consumers access to their medical records.
Among the common disputes are whether covered entities are allowed to charge patients retrieval fees for copies of their own records. HIPAA strictly limits charges associated with providing patients access to their records to "a reasonable, cost-based fee" for copying, postage and any time spent on preparing a summary explanation (as applicable). Thus, in instances where state laws allow providers to charge the patient other record-retrieval fees, such as costs associated with retrieving records for insurance companies, lawyers and other non-patients, providers may not be permitted to pass along these costs to their patients due to HIPAA, despite any such permissive state law. Also, some providers erroneously believe that they are not allowed to fax or email medical records to a patient, even at the patient's request.
For some providers, confusion over the rules and unreasonable fear of penalties under HIPAA and state privacy laws has resulted in reluctance to release medical records to the people HIPAA was designed to protect: the patients themselves. I personally experienced this type of resistance shortly after the Privacy Rule became effective in 2003, when confusion was more understandable. By 2009, you'd think covered entities would have a better grasp on their rights and duties, but misunderstandings persist.
Full post as published by HIPAA Health Law & Technology on July 29, 2009 (boomark / email).
COBRA Continuation of Healthcare Coverage after Layoff
Pensions and Health Care Coverage for Dislocated Workers
WA Dept. of Social and Health Services
Class action settlement reached will give $45,000 each to thousands of minority day-care providers.
Suit Filed On Behalf of 400,000 Michigan Medicaid-Dependents Denied Access to Dental Healthcare
Michigan Medicaid Sued Over Dental Healthcare
Skilled HealthCare Settles Class Action for $50 Million
Skilled HealthCare Settles Class Action for $50 Million
Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc
SKH
Healthcare Payout
Merge to pay $250,000 upon settling derivative lawsuit.
Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud

HIPAA, HITECH & FTC Red Flags Rule
Healthcare Providers Online: Legal Perils for the Uninitiated
HITECH / HIPAA Compliance Frameworks
Deflation Paranoia strikes deep...
David Harlow quoted in Radiology Today on HIPAA compliance reviews
HIPAA: Can you release medical information to family and friends







