Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Florida Blogs -> South Florida Lawyers
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Florida
: South Florida Lawyers11th Circuit Affirms Guts of YoPlus Class Cert Decision.
Judge Huck's Yoplus class certification decision was closely watched, and no doubt gave some indigestion.
Insert groan here.
Yet the 11th, via Judge Fay, has affirmed its reasoning and Judge Huck's "scholarly" analysis, though it was kicked back to remove any reliance element from the class definition:
The district court?s analysis in its Order on Motion for Class Certification is sound and in accord with federal and state law. The reasoning reflected therein is well within the parameters of Rule 23?s requirements for certification of a class. And, if the definition of the class had been in accord with the legal analysis, we would have readily affirmed.1 However, at the end of the district court?s Order, it defined the class in a manner which seems to conflict with its earlier sound analysis. In its analysis, the district court repeatedly stated that a plaintiff need not prove reliance on the allegedly false statement to recover damages under FDUTPA, but rather a plaintiff must simply prove that an objective reasonable person would have been deceived. And, this is correct. Notwithstanding this analysis, the district court went on to define the class as ?all persons who purchased Yo-Plus in the State of Florida to obtain its claimed digestive health benefit.? Order at 21 (emphasis added). The class definition limits the class to those who purchased YoPlus ?to obtain its claimed digestive health benefit,? which takes into account individual reliance on the digestive health claims. Had the district court defined the class in a manner which did not take individual reliance into account, such would be consistent with the district court?s earlier analysis. Thus, we vacate the Order certifying the class and remand to the district court for further consideration.Seriously, what kind of maroon believes that "magic yogurt" somehow improves your digestive health?
(Wait a second, people are taking Donald Trump's run for the Presidency seriously. On second thought, don't answer that.)
Full post as published by South Florida Lawyers on March 29, 2011 (boomark / email).
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
PTDS class action
Veterans Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Class Action
Sunscreen Manufacturers Face Class Actions over Misleading Advertising
Banana Boat, Coppertone Face Class Action in Canada
ASMP and Other Visual Artists File Class Action Lawsuit Against Google
Google Faces Class Action for Copyright Infringement
Settlement Reached in Female Athletes' Class Action
Slippery Rock University Settles Discrimination Class Action
GE Reitrement Class Action Settled
GE $40 Million Settlement Agreed in Retirement Class Action








