ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Ninth Circuit Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Federal Judiciary

: Ninth Circuit Blog

By Jon Sands

ADVERTISEMENTS
U.S. v. Mendoza, No. 06-50447 (3-3-08). The government waited 8 years between indictment and arrest. Although the defendant was in the Philippines for a good part of that time, the government failed to notify him, or make any attempt to contact him about the tax charges. As a result, the government's dawdling results in a Sixth Amendment speedy trial right.

U.S. v. Cannel, No. 06-30590 (3-3-08). The defendant alleged a plain error breach of the plea agreement because the government objected to acceptance of responsibility and would not move for a third level. This was in a child porn case. The defendant objected to the PSR's enhancement for distribution of porn. The government responded and objected to any reduction for acceptance of responsibility because of the position the defendant took. The court overruled the objection to acceptance, but lacked jurisdiction to grant a third level because the government did not move for it. The problem with defendant is that he got a below guideline sentence, and so the 9th found no breach and no prejudice.

In re Copley Press, Inc., ex rel US v. Higuera-Guerrero, No. 07-72143 (3-4-08). You know that every federal judge pines for First Amendment cases; "ha-ha!," they'll exclaim, "real constitutional issues." So it is here, in a major narcotics case with cooperation, where the press wants to read all the plea colloquies and attachments and transcripts in a sealed criminal proceeding. The 9th (Kozinski) goes through the tests, finds various rights to see the documents, but finds in some a substantial government interest in sealing due to danger. Some parts of the colloquies get disclosed; some do not.

U.S. v. Alghazouli, No. 06-50422 (3-4-08). In this "green" era, the defendant argues that the law is not black and white. Here, it concerned regulations that forbid the importation of R-12 Freon, an ozone depleting substance. The 9th affirmed the convictions, holding that a regulation was indeed a law, but only when the statute specifies that a violation of the regulation is a crime.

Full post as published by Ninth Circuit Blog on March 05, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/04/26 08:37:19)