Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Second Circuit Sentencing Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Second Circuit Sentencing BlogA Wild Sentencing Story
United States v. Walker, No. 08-1474-cr (2d Cir. April 8, 2009) (found here)
You don't often see a story like this one.
Walker was sentenced to 96 months for two counts of bank fraud. On appeal, he argued that (among other things) the sentence was "greater than necessary" to accomplish the purposes of sentencing set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Obviously, the district court had disagreed, particularly in light of Walker's "monstrous," "ghoulish" and "audacious" conduct while awaiting sentencing. So, what did Walker do? Read on:
Full post as published by Second Circuit Sentencing Blog on April 08, 2009 (boomark / email).

Evidence that judges will follow sensible sentencing guidelines
Are we headed toward virtual sentencing proceedings
Debate and controversy over sentencing in the UK
Austrailian study on restorative sentencing alternative







