ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Decision of the Day

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Federal Judiciary

: Decision of the Day

Seventh Upholds Student?s Right to Wear ?Be Happy, Not Gay? T-Shirt

By Robert Loblaw

ADVERTISEMENTS

Nuxoll v. Indian Prairie School District, 08-1050 (7th Cir., April 23, 2008)

In a late-breaking school speech case, the Seventh Circuit has concluded that a high school sophomore is entitled to a preliminary injunction that allows him to wear a banned t-shirt opposing homosexuality.

This case arises from dueling awareness days and accompanying t-shirts in a Naperville, Illinois high school. On the school?s “Day of Silence,” members of the school?s gay-straight alliance broadcast their tolerance by wearing t-shirts with slogans like “Be Who You Are.” The next day is called “Day of Truth,” on which a different group of students wear t-shirts with slogans like “Be Happy, Not Gay.”

School officials concluded that the latter slogan violated the school?s code of conduct, which forbids derogatory comments about race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability. So sophomore Alexander Nuxoll sued, arguing that he had a First Amendment right to wear his “Be Happy, Not Gay” t-shirt. The district court denied preliminary relief, but the Seventh Circuit reverses. The panel unanimously agrees that Nuxoll is likely to succeed on the merits of this claim and is therefore entitled to a preliminary injunction.

Judge Posner?s lead opinion is worth reading, as always. But so is Judge Rovner?s concurrence. While Judge Posner scratches his head wondering why kids are so silly and why anyone would be offended at a t-shirt, Judge Rover spills an inordinate amount of ink explaining why the slogan is derogatory. But she spills even more ink explaining why speech in schools is so important. It is a breath of fresh air after decisions like this and this, in which judges have openly disdained students who pursue First Amendment crusades. The Seventh?s decision also creates an unacknowledged split with the Ninth, which rejected a similar claim from an anti-gay high schooler. (My coverage here.)

Full post as published by Decision of the Day on April 23, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Blog Posts
Search Blog Directory:

Search Blog Directory:

Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.7325 secs (new cache)