Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> SCOTUSBLOG
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: SCOTUSBLOGReply Brief in Meacham v. Knolls
By Akin Gump Supreme Court Practice Group
Today, Howe & Russell and the Stanford clinic are filing this reply brief in Meacham v. Knolls, No. 05-1605. Stanford students Allan Mouritsen, Scott Noveck and Scott Stewart assisted on the brief. The case involves the burdens of proof in disparate impact actions under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.
For those interested, here are petitioner?s opening brief, respondents? brief, and the brief of the United States as amicus supporting petitioners.
The case will be argued on April 23, 2008.
UPDATE 12:10PM: Here are the amicus briefs as well:
Supporting Petitioners: AARP/NELA
Supporting Respondents: Chamber of Commerce, Assoc. Corporate Counsel, Equal Employment Advisory Council, General Electric, National School Boards Assoc.
Full post as published by SCOTUSBLOG on April 14, 2008 (boomark / email).

Employers face additional burden in defending age claims
Employer Has Burden of Proof on RFOA
Big Employment Law Day at Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Age Discrimination Burdens of Proof
U.S. Supreme Court Issues Three New Employment-Related Decisions Today
April 23rd is MetLife Day at U.S. Supreme Court








