Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Utah District Court Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Utah District Court BlogPrivacy Awareness
A recent letter from Senator Lieberman to the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure asked the courts to review their processes:
The court policy states that the redaction responsibilities for filed documents rest with the filer. The courts' official response to Senator Lieberman's letter outlined the complexity of the privacy issue in court records, and restated the courts' committment to educating lawyers about the need for privacy redactions. The notice in CM/ECF is designed to remind filers of their responsibilities.I have concerns that not enough has been done to protect personal
information contained in publicly available court filings, potentially violating
another provision of the E-Government Act. A recent investigation by Carl
Malamud of the non-profit Public.Resource.org found numerous examples of
personal data not being redacted in these records.
Full post as published by Utah District Court Blog on April 09, 2009 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Landlord Entry Right and Tenant Privacy
When can a landlord enter a rented dwelling
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
AOL Privacy Class Action
Can Proceed
CVS Mailing
Sparks Allegations of Privacy Violation
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.

Who knows about Privacy Awareness Week
security & privacy - not a zero sum game
Counterrorist Data Mining Needs Privacy Protection









