Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> SCOTUSBLOG
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: SCOTUSBLOGJanuary arguments, day by day
By Akin Gump Supreme Court Practice Group
The Supreme Court on Monday released the argument calendar (available here) for the session beginning Monday, Jan. 12. There will be a total of ten arguments during that period; no hearings are set for Jan. 19, a legal holiday, and Jan. 20, presidential inauguration day. Here are the scheduled arguments, with summaries of the issues:
Mon., Jan. 12
Coeur Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council (07-984) and Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council (07-990) — government authority to deposit dredged dirt in waterways
Ministry of Defense of Iran v. Elahi (07-615) — U.S. court’s power to seize assets of a foreign government to pay a debt
Harbison v. Bell (07-8521) — right to use federally funded lawyer to seek clemency in a capital or other criminal case
Tues., Jan. 13
Montejo v. Louisiana (07-1529) — obligation of a suspect to take action to prevent police from questioning him outside the presence of his lawyer
Vermont v. Brillon (08-88) — scope of the speedy trial right for a poor person being represented by a public defender
Knowles v. Mirzayance (07-1315) — defense lawyer’s duty not to withdraw the only defense available — here, an insanity plea
Wed., Jan. 14
Puckett v. U.S. (07-9712) — appeals court’s duty when prosecutors violate a plea bargain, when the violation was not challenged at trial
Boyle v. U.S. (07-1309) — proof required to show an enterprise under the RICO anti-racketeering law
No arguments Jan. 19 or 20
Wed., Jan. 21
Corley v. U.S. (07-10441) — suppression of a voluntary confession made after an arrest on federal charges but before appearing before a magistrate
Kansas v. Ventris (07-1356) — right to use a statement an individual gave to police to challenge testimony given at the trial, if the individual had not waived his right to a lawyer at the time of the statement
Full post as published by SCOTUSBLOG on November 03, 2008 (boomark / email).

Ky Supreme Court Oral Arguments January 16, 2008 In Thomas v. Thomas
Illinois Supreme Court Will Post Oral Arguments on the Web
status of Senate Bill to mandate broadcasts of Supreme Court arguments
VIDEO: Streaming Videos of SCOKY arguments posted at Kentucky Court Report







