Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Supreme Dicta
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Supreme DictaHappy Birthday, Judicial Review
ADVERTISEMENTS
Yesterday marked the 205th birthday of arguably the most important Supreme Court case in history, Marbury v. Madison. The facts of the case are a bit confusing: incoming Secretary of State James Madison refused to deliver a commission issued by outgoing President John Adams, appointing William Marbury as Justice of the Peace in the District of Columbia. Marbury filed for a writ of mandamus directly from the Supreme Court, which was authorized under the Judiciary Act of 1789. However, Chief Justice Marshall (who was the outgoing Secretary of State that should have delivered the commissions), ruled that Congress cannot change the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court because it would conflict with the conditions for original jurisdiction set forth in Article III of the Constitution. Thus, Marshall ruled that section of the Judiciary Act unconstitutional.Cliff Notes version: judicial review is born.
Full post as published by Supreme Dicta on February 25, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
FDA Review of Prostate Cancer Treatment Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Prostate Cancer Treatment FDA Review Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Xigris
Study Prompts FDA Safety Review
Lipitor
Review of Studies Show No Significant Benefit in Women
Wrinkle-Fillers
FDA to Review Labeling due to Adverse Event Reports
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.









