ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Family Law Blogs -> Kevin Hickey Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Family Law

: Kevin Hickey Law Blog

Is It Really Worth It Wal-Mart?

By

ADVERTISEMENTS

There is a little known clause in the majority of health insurance policies called a “subrogation clause.”  There are many facets to it, but the most important for you to know is this:  If you are injured in some type of accident (car, etc.); and your health insurance pays your medical bills; and it turns out that someone else is responsible for your injury (ie. his/her car hit your car); then your health insurer has the right to seek recovery from the person that hit you, as well as you personally if you received money from a lawsuit.  The theory behind this is that the health insurer should not have to bear the cost of medical expenses for you if another person caused your injury.  That person, or his insurance company, should be responsible for your bills.

This is all well and good until that last portion of the subrogation clause kicks in.  Take the case of Debbie Shank, 52, who was severely injured when her vehicle collided with a semi-trailer truck.  She worked for Wal-Mart, and her Wal-Mart health insurance policy kicked in and started paying the medical bills.  Well, she sued the trucking company and won after years of court battles.  After her lawyer’s fees and expenses were paid, she was left with only $417,500.00 to pay for future medical expenses.  She is wheelchair bound and brain damaged as a result of the accident so her future medical expenses, not to mention pain and suffering, will probably be significant.

Enter Wal-Mart.  3 years after Shank received her money, Wal-Mart sued her to recover the expenses it paid for her medical care.  Shank lost.  She appealed.  And lost again.  Legally, there is not much dispute that Wal-Mart has the right to subrogation.  But are you kidding me?  I can’t believe Wal-Mart wants to seek subrogation from this woman and take the remaining money she has left from a horrendous and tragic event in her life.  Its not like Wal-Mart needs the money.

Come on Wal-Mart.  Just because you have the legal right to do something doesn’t mean its the morally right thing to do.  Drop it and move on.  This money is not even a drop in the bucket of what you bring in on any given week.

Let Debbie Shank be.

Here’s a link to an article on the subject…

http://www.nwaonline.net/articles/2007/11/28/business/112907shank.txt

Here’s a link to a donation page for the Shanks…

http://walmartwatch.com/press/releases/wal_mart_watch_to_raise_money_for_former_wal_mart_employee_deborah_shank/

Full post as published by Kevin Hickey Law Blog on November 29, 2007 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/01/26 01:08:13)