Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ethics
: Legal Ethics ForumSir Cyril Smith struck a small blow for freedom
Telegraph: From Sir Cyril Smith's obit:
In 1985 [Smith] was instrumental in making a small dent in one of the biggest closed shops of all, the Bar. A group of Labour MPs had brought a libel action against him, claiming he had accused them of treachery during the Falklands war. Smith decided to apologise, but discovered he would have to pay a barrister £150 to read his statement to the High Court rather than employ a solicitor at a fraction of the cost. He took the issue to the Court of Appeal, which conceded that the rights of audience rules could be changed by the judges in a particular case.
Legal history was made when Leo Abse MP, both a solicitor and one of the plaintiffs, appeared gowned, but not wigged, to read the statement. Smith pronounced himself pleased to have ?knocked a little sense into the legal profession and bust at least one of its cosy little practices?.
(Here's an explanation of "rights of audience" -- a term that isn't familiar to all US lawyers, because we don't have a two-tiered bar.)
Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on September 06, 2010 (boomark / email).
Anna Nicole Smith's Legal Troubles
Court cases and legal issues related to Anna Nicole Smith
Citigroup Smith Barney
Settle Gender Class Action for $33 Million
Religious Decorations
Oklahoma City to pay attorney fees in religious freedom violations lawsuit.

Science libel verdict is a forceful blow in defence of freedom of speech The Times
Science libel verdict is a forceful blow in defence of freedom of speech
6 Hour Energy Shot v 5 Hour Energy Shot
Treatment of Christian campus group doesnt pass smell test
Chairman Conyers Deeply Troubled by FBI Juror Interviews in Cyril Wecht Mistrial








