ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Ethics

: Legal Ethics Forum

Privilege Issues for Tax and Regulatory Work Product

ADVERTISEMENTS

Dennis Ventry (UC Davis) has published ???Protecting Abusive Tax Avoidance,??? which explores the application of privilege (attorney-client, work product, and tax-practitioner/client) in both the tax and regulatory contexts.

The article provides a detailed discussion of the development of the work product doctrine as well as its modern incarnation. In addition, it examines in detail an important recent case, United States v. Textron, in which the district court awarded blanket work product immunity to a corporate taxpayer???s tax planning materials that propped up a series of nine abusive tax shelter transactions. As I argue in the article, the decision ???expands the work-product doctrine beyond its historical role of protecting the adversarial process, and it swallows the attorney-client privilege, effectively cloaking from discovery not just all legal advice but all advice pertaining to potential litigation, no matter how unlikely. In addition, the decision protects precisely the kind of abusive tax avoidance that Congress and the Treasury Department have fought to root out and punish.??? On appeal in September, the Government relied on the article at several points during oral argument. And more recently, the Government cited the article liberally in its appellate brief in yet another tax work product case, Regions Financial Corp. v. United States (11th Circuit).

Although I endorse the Government's position in both of the above cases, I acknowledge and explore in the article that a strict application of current work product law can produce harsh results. Indeed, under current law, the taxpayer/regulatee always loses on the threshold question of whether the documents at issue were reasonably prepared in anticipation of litigation (which would justify protection) or, alternatively, were prepared to comply with regulatory requirements (which would justify discovery). As a way to mitigate these harsh results, I offer several alterations to the work product doctrine, including (i) a sliding scale of protection for attorney work product in the regulatory context as well as (ii) a modified form of selective or limited waiver (which could be incorporated into a sliding-scale approach) for documents prepared for regulatory purposes.

Download Ventry_Textron.pdf

Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on October 22, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 10/31/26 11:52:28)