Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ethics
: Legal Ethics ForumPatently-O: "Blocking Attorneys from Simultaneously Litigating and Prosecuting Patents"
ADVERTISEMENTS
From Patently-O, Interesting development in the Second Circuit, where a district court denied a company's request for a so-called "prosecution bar" protective order, that is, for an order that the adversary's litigation counsel be barred from prosecuting patents for the adversary while the counsel is in possession of non-public information about the company's technology. Such orders are common, so the Second Circuit will need to resolve when such orders are warranted and when they aren't.
Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on December 01, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Becker County
Faces Civil Rights Class Action by Inmates and their Attorneys
Generic Versions
Barr Pharmaceuticals to pay $5.9 million settlement for blocking the sale of oral contraceptives.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Blocking Attorneys from Simultaneously Litigating and Prosecuting Patents
ABA IP Roundtable: Litigating Software Patents
Patently-O Bits and Bytes: Vote for Patently-O
Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 25
Jorda on: The Complementariness of Patents and Trade Secrets
Law of the Game on Joystiq: Patently Complicated









