Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ethics
: Legal Ethics ForumInadvertent Receipt and Firm-Wide Disqualification
Interesting case, depending on which set of facts you base your result on: the majority reasoned that if a lawyer at a firm inadvertently receives privileged documents and doesn't do as is required under state law -- notify and return -- that the entire firm as a matter of law is disqualified. The concurring opinion, though, laid out the facts more fully, and it's clear that at least two, and probably more, lawyers reviewed the documents and the firm claimed privilege over the extent of the internal disclosure, and so for that reason firm-wide disqualification was in order. The case, Greenberg Taurg v. Atlas Air, Inc., __ So.2d __ (Fla. App. Sept. 17, 2008), is here.
Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on September 18, 2008 (boomark / email).
Ticketmaster Class Action
Canada-wide suit launched
California Firm Recalls Ready-To-Eat Pork Products
California Firm Recalls Ready-To-Eat Pork Products
Colorado Firm Recalls Beef Products
Due To Possible E. coli Contamination
South Carolina Firm
Recalls Frozen Meat and Poultry Products
Firm Associate
Attorney Jay Wingate ordered to pay widow $2.5 million settlement for collected legal fees.
California Firm Recalls Beef and Bean Burritos for Possible Listeria Contamination
Beef & Bean Burritos Recalled by Windsor Foods

Fun With A Custom Receipt Generator
Are Credit Card Receipt Class Actions Annihilating Corporate America
Book, Movie Do Not Require Disqualification Of Prosecutor
U.S. House of Representatives Passes New Rule of Evidence on Inadvertent Disclosures
Fourth District: Disqualification








