Ethics

Gillian Hadfield has posted her essay, Legal Barriers to Innovation.  (HT: Solum)  Here's the abstract:

The American Bar Association and its state-level brethren control and regulate the legal profession, determining who can provide legal services, how those providers are trained, and what business forms those providers can use. This professional regulation limits what may be offered as a legal product or service, homogenizes the pool of potential innovators in terms of training and risk-orientation, prohibits the corporate practice of law, severely restricts the available financing for large-scale legal ventures, and constrains the capacity to exploit economies of scope and scale in developing better methods of producing what business clients ultimately need. This article examines this problem and encourages states to adopt a different regulatory structure that encourages innovation that benefits legal clients.

In the essay itself, she refers to the "cost of stagnation" that stems from self-regulation.  This essay is a shorter version of Prof. Hadfield's earlier article in the Stanford Law Review.