Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Employment Law Blogs -> Maryland Employment Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Employment Law
: Maryland Employment LawHow Employment Lawyers Charge Their Clients
By James Edward Rubin
There are four ways a lawyer can charge: by the hour, on a flat rate, on a contingency-fee basis, or some combination therof. Choosing how to charge involves an evaluation of risk for both the attorney and the client.
Hourly billing -Most risky for client; Least risky for attorney.
The attorney keeps track of his or her time and send the client a bill for the hours worked. Because liability often is not readily apparent in employment law cases, many employment law attorneys require that the initial phase of the attorney-client relationship be based on hourly billing. In purely defensive cases, such as when an employer is claiming my client is violating a non-competition agreement, hourly billing is often the most rational choice. (Much has been written about hourly billing variants, such as value-based billing. I am keeping it simple for this article.)
Flat Rate -- Moderately risky to the client; Moderately risky to attorney.
Employment lawyers bill a flat rate for certain discrete tasks. For example, I have processed federal employee disability retirement applications on a flat rate. The client pays a set fee and does not need to worry about the amount of time I am spending on his or her matter.
Contingency Fee -- least risky to the client; most risky to attorney.
The attorney only recovers a fee if the client wins. For this reason, most employment attorneys will not consider a pure contingency fee relationship unless the employer's liability and ability to pay are clear. I generally only consider pure contingency fee arrangements in overtime, unpaid commissions, and accrued vacation pay cases.
Combination of Hourly, Flat Rate, and/or Contingency Fee.
The lawyer and client and agree to any combination of the above. For example, the lawyer and client may agree to hourly billing until the bills reach a certain dollar amount and then agree to convert the matter to a contingency fee relationship. The possibilities are infinite and require careful analysis of the merits of the claim and the possibility for settlement or success at trial.
Full post as published by Maryland Employment Law on August 30, 2007 (boomark / email).
Employment Contracts
General Contract Law Principles
Kentucky lawyers
fraud case ends in mistrial.
Siouxland Urology Center
Sued for Potentially Exposing Clients to HIV and Hepatitis
NCAA and Ticketmaster
alleging they have a monopoly on college sports events and charge non-refundable fees to enter a lottery for the rights to purchase tickets to the sporting events.
New York Employment Law
alleged violations of New York employment law.
SunTrust HELOC Loan Termination
SunTrust HELOC allegedly violated clients contracts by decreasing, freezing, or terminating HELOC loans.
Financial Elder Abuse - Financial Exploitation, Elder Abuse Lawyers
Financial Elder Abuse alleging seniors are taken advantage of for their finances.

New Lawyer Ratings Paradigm Creates Challenges for Law Firms
"Decide on Ideal Clients by Identifying Clients You Don't Want"
Cost of hiring an attorney: consumer lawyers vs. regular lawyers








