Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Education Law Blogs -> Edjurist
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Education Law
: EdjuristPaying for the National Standards with Federal Dollars
Recent developments around the formation of national standards have been really interesting. They got even more so today as Secretary Duncan has announced that the federal government will spend $350 million developing tests off whatever standards are eventually developed by the collection of 46 states.
Scott has written eloquently about this movement here and I agree with all of his points, even though my instinct is more toward state control (I don't think I trust the federal government). Anyway, one of the questions he raised in that post was concerning enforcement and specifically concerning the millions (or billions) needed to develop new tests to actually make these standards mean something.
Well, here is a 350 million dollar down payment and the DOE clearly sees its role as bankrolling this whole enterprise.
Asked to explain the money's focus on developing more tests, Duncan said developing the standards themselves would be relatively inexpensive.
Developing assessments, by contrast, is a "very heavy lift financially," he said, expressing concern that the project could stall without federal backing.
"Having real high standards is important, but behind that, I think in this country we have too many bad tests," Duncan said. "If we're going to have world-class international standards, we need to have world-class evaluations behind them."
So, we have national standards developed by states and paid for, and enforced, by the federal government. This is getting messy already and we don't even have a single standard developed yet.
This is a constitutional end-run if I have ever seen one.
So, the federal government is going to pony up the money but not contribute at all to the formation of the standards? When was the last time the federal government was that gratuitous? They are not, that's the answer. There are standards and then there are tests. Ask any teacher, any single one, whether for the sake of curriculum development the standard or the test is the most important aspect. What gets tested, gets taught. If the federal government dictates the test ... the federal government dictates curriculum - and federalism as we know it in education is over.
Full post as published by Edjurist on June 15, 2009 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Federal National Mortgage Association
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Overtime for Programmers
alleging that some companies try to avoid paying employees overtime by categorizing them as "salaried" employees.
Canadian Government
former RCMP officer claims thousands of disability dollars clawed back.
Frank Bluestein, The Maximum Financial Group, Inc., Questar Capital Corporation, and Gunnallen Financial, Inc.
alleging schemed investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars.
Couple Awarded Nearly One Million Dollars in Lawsuit
Condo Lawsuit Gets $1 Million Award
National Steak and Poultry Recalls 248,000 Pounds of Beef Products
248,000 Pounds of Beef Products Recalled by National Steak and Poultry

Congress is Costing You Thousands of Dollars...
The debate on national standards heats up again
What ONE TRILLION dollars looks like in dollar bills...
There is an alternative to toll roads and toll bridges in Kentucky.








