Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense Weeklyweekly edition
By Karl R. Keys, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
This week’s edition is now available:
The Supreme Court’s holding in Albert Holland v. Florida leads off this edition. The headnote to the case places the holding well when it notes that “Holland diligently pursued his rights by writing [counsel] numerous letters seeking crucial information and providing direction, by repeatedly requesting that [counsel] be removed from his case, and by filing his own pro se habeas petition on the day he learned his AEDPA filing period had expired.” Despite his diligence the district court denied relief and the Court of Appeals applied the AEDPA’s one year statute of limitations a little to rigidly. On these facts, therefore, a remand is necessary for further evaluation as to the applicability of equitable tolling...continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on June 23, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Monday Evening Winddown: Fourth of July edition
The Weekly Law School Roundup #109
Lawyers Weekly gets letter from murderer









