Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense Weeklyweekly edition
By Karl R. Keys, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
From this week’s edition:?
Leading off this double edition is the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals opinion in Ex Parte Roy Gene Smith. The CCA in Smith granted relief under Penry. ?[T]he trial court was required to provide a constitutionally adequate vehicle for the jury to fully consider and give effect to [the proffered mitigation evidence. The trial court?s failure to do so ?[went] to the very basis of the case? and ?vitally affected [the applicant?s] defensive theory? at the punishment phase, because the jury had no adequate means to act upon the applicant?s mitigation theory, such as it was.? The CCA found similarly, in granting relief, in its unpublished decision Ex parte David Lee Lewis.
In the news, the American Board of Anesthesiologists’ decided to sanction members who participate in lethal injection executions...continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on May 12, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Monday Evening Winddown: Fourth of July edition
The Weekly Law School Roundup #109
Lawyers Weekly gets letter from murderer








