Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Tenth Circuit Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Tenth Circuit BlogBy Shari Allison
ADVERTISEMENTS
U.S. v. Hasan, 2010 WL 2510727 (6/23/10) (Okl.) (Published) - After a prior remand from the 10th, the d. ct. failed to apply the proper law in determining whether the grand jury proceedings complied with the Court Interpreters Act ("CIA"). The d.ct. mistakenly focused on the defendant 's communication with his employers, students and wife in English, when the question under the CIA is whether he spoke primarily a language other than English, in this case, Somali. If on remand the d. ct. determined the defendant's primary language was Somali, the d. ct. must then decide whether the defendant was so inhibited in his ability to communicate and comprehend before the grand jury that the proceedings were fundamentally unfair.The 10th then discussed whether it should decide the evidence-sufficiency question in this perjury case or leave that for another day, as it had on the first appeal...continue to full postFull post as published by Tenth Circuit Blog on August 04, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.










