ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Tenth Circuit Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Tenth Circuit BlogBy Shari Allison
ADVERTISEMENTS
U.S. v. Johnson, 2011 WL 729232 (3/3/11) (Kan.) (unpub'd) - Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. 692 (1981), which holds that officers may detain any "occupant" of property that the officers are searching pursuant to a warrant, is a bright-line rule that is not subject to an ad hoc balancing test. It doesn't matter whether detention serves any legitimate interest. In this case, the defendant was found sleeping in a car that was half on the property and half off of it. and had no other relationship to the property. "Occupant" includes anyone present on the premises. The fact that the search was for meth and firearms and the high level of traffic in the area justified displaying firearms and handcuffing the defendant.Colbert v. Board of County Commissioners for Oklahoma County, 2011 WL 692991 (3/1/11) (unpub'd) - The 10th reverses the dismissal of a § 1983 complaint and finds the prisoner alleged enough that, if true, would establish deliberate indifference to medical needs constituting cruel and unusual punishment...continue to full postFull post as published by Tenth Circuit Blog on March 10, 2011 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.









