Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense Weeklyup & out
By Karl R. Keys, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
From the intro to this week’s edition:
Leading off this edition is the Arkansas Supreme Court’s decision concerning the West Memphis Three in Damien Echols v. State, Baldwin v. State & Misskelley v. State. The Court holds “that the circuit court erroneously interpreted the Arkansas DNA testing statutes” when it denied the three DNA testing. On remand “the circuit court shall hear Echols?s motion for a new trial and consider the DNA-test results ‘with all other evidence in the case regardless of whether the evidence was introduced at trial’ to determine if Echols has ‘establish[ed] by compelling evidence that a new trial would result in acquittal.’” The Arkansas DNA test “statute requires that the court ‘promptly set an early hearing on the petition and response’ unless ‘the petition and the files and records of the proceeding conclusively show that the petitioner is entitled to no relief...continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on November 16, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.










