ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Bookmark Follow Me Email to a friend

Criminal Law

: Fourth Amendment

WA: Being under influence is not reason for a frisk

By John Wesley Hall, Jr. (all)

Being under the influence was not a reason for a frisk because there was no indication that the defendant was armed. State v. Setterstrom, 2008 Wash. LEXIS 481 (May 22, 2008): ¶17 We do not find such a basis here. The police received an anonymous call claiming Setterstrom was under the influence, heard a lie about his name, and observed his nervous, fidgety behavior. The record shows no threatening gestures or words. Setterstrom did not even stand. At most, the record shows that Setterstrom was under the influence; this is not a crime in itself. Evidence support conclusion that the officers had reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing for a frisk during traffic stop. United States v. Bowen, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 10981 (9th Cir. May 12, 2008) (unpublished)...continue to full post

Full post as published by Fourth Amendment on May 24, 2008 (boomark / email).

Related Law Blog Posts
Search Blog Directory:

Search Blog Directory:

Related Law Questions
Lawsuits and Settlements


















US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource









Click here






Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!











Click here
0.5264 secs