Criminal Law
: Tenth Circuit BlogUpward Variance OK
By Shari Allison (all)
U.S. v. Taghizadeh, 2008 WL 17901291 (4/21/08) (unpub'd) - The 10th affirms an upward variance from 121 months to 216 months on the grounds that the sexual-exploitation-of-a-minor Guidelines contemplated neither the videotaping of sexual acts [as opposed to sexually explicit poses] nor the defendant participating in the sexual acts. Those were two separate, [not double-counting] factors that justified the variance. Importantly, though, the 10th confirmed the continued vitality of the Atencio case, 476 F.3d at 1106, asserting that a district court commits a procedural error if its reason for a variance is already factored into the sentence or it uses the same justification to support multiple deviations from the guideline range. That contention might [or might not] be in some tension with U...continue to full post
Full post as published by Tenth Circuit Blog on April 29, 2008 (boomark / email).

Valdes: No reasons for extraordinary variance
In U.S. v. Valdes, No. 06-15951 (Sept. 18, 2007), the Court vacated a 108-month sentence, which exceeded the 41-51 month range of the PSI, and the 57-71 month range urged by the government...
"Impermissible Factors" Follow-up
As a follow-up to my recent blogpost about U.S. v. Davis, I did some research into what the Sixth Circuit had found to be "impermissible factors" outside of Davis...
MA Appeals Court Finds Property Owner Failed to Exercise Rights Under Variance Sufficient to Prevent its Lapse
The Town granted Paul Cornell a variance to subdivide a parcel into two lots. After more than a year, Cornell applied for a building permit...
NY Appellate Court Says Failure to Name Applicant in a Lawsuit Challenging Granted Use Variance was Fatal
In protracted litigation following the granting of a use variance by the NYC Board of Standards and Appeal (BSA) to allow 160 Imlay Real Estate (Imlay) to change the use of a building in an M2-1 zoning district which permits manufacturing, commercial and retail use, to permit a residential use...
CA1: First bends to affirm enhanced sentence because of unresolved conduct and non-noticed conduct
US v. Politano, No. 06-2342 affirms an upward Booker variance. Applying Gall v. United States, 128 S...
Zoning Variance May Not Be Limited To The Term of Ownership of the Applicant
In upholding the decision of a zoning board denying an area variance, the Appellate Division in Fowlkes v Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of North Hempstead noted that the variance could not have been limited in time to the term of ownership of the present applicant...








