ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Kansas Federal Defender
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Kansas Federal DefenderThe Sotomayor Difference
By Melody Evans and Kirk Redmond
ADVERTISEMENTS
Do authors of reports, such as drug lab results, have to testify in person, and may the burden rest on the defense to make such a demand for confrontation?
Yesterday, SCOTUS heard arguments in Briscoe v. Virginia, a case that followed on the heels of last term's Melendez-Diaz v. Mass. Melendez, in short, held that under Crawford, a witness?s testimony against a defendant is inadmissibleFull post as published by Kansas Federal Defender on January 13, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

The Sotomayor Nomination - UPDATED
Breaking News Sotomayor Confirmed To Sit On Supreme Court
The Politics of the Sotomayor Nomination







