Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Existing as a Public Defender
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Existing as a Public DefenderThe Sixth Amendment
ADVERTISEMENTS
I wish I could understand the mentality of some prosecutors. A person accused of a crime is granted the right to a public and speedy trial. A right so important, the states have adopted it in their criminal procedure rules. So why should persons accused be punished for exercising their rights?? It never ceases to amaze me the number of times that a prosecutor is OFFENDED by the fact that a client wants a trial. And they will do anything to prevent it. Filing additional charges, filing felonies when the client was only charged with misdemeanors, seeking to have bonds revoked for no legitimate reasons.Are they that unsure of their abilities at a trial?Are they that convinced that someone accused MUST be guilty?Everyone gets up in arms about someone accused "violating the rights" of the victims involved...continue to full postFull post as published by Existing as a Public Defender on May 05, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

SCOTUS Clarifies When Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel Attaches
Second Circuit upholds Sixth Amendment KPMG ruling
Immigration consequences collateral to Sixth Amendment: COM. V. PADILLA (SC 1/24/2008)
SCOTUS Grants Cert. in Seven Criminal Cases
Forfeiture and the Sixth Amendment: From Drug to White-Collar Cases
Are Verdicts by Non-Unanimous Criminal Juries Constitutionally Permissible








