Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Grits for Breakfast

Criminal Law

: Grits for Breakfast

SCOTUS to hear debate on whether forensic science is objective or testimonial

SCOTUSBlog and Doc Berman let us know that the US Supreme Court today will hear oral arguments in Melendez-Diaz vs. Massachussetts, a case I've been watching (see prior Grits coverage) because it will determine whether forensic technicians should be subject to cross examination at trial under the Constitution's "Confrontation Clause."Anybody who thinks lab experts don't require vetting need look no further than the recent Texas Department of Public Safety case where:During a routine audit, DPS breath test employees found that electronic records had been altered to make it appear that the technical supervisor had inspected breath test instruments in several locations when the contractor had not in fact examined them to ensure that the calibrations were accurate...continue to full post

Full post as published by Grits for Breakfast on November 10, 2008 (boomark / email).