Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Crime and Consequences
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Crime and ConsequencesSCOTUS Today
By Kent Scheidegger et al.
ADVERTISEMENTS
The U.S. Supreme Court issued its first opinion of the term in an argued case, Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., No. 07-1239, the "boink the whales" case. SCOTUSblog has a report here.
On the argument calendar for today is Bell v. Kelly, which could be the "sleeper" case of the term. Both sides are "all-in" on the question of the interaction between new evidence in federal habeas hearings and the deference standard of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). Petitioner claims that (1) the question of whether the state court decision was "reasonable" for the purpose of 2254(d) must be determined solely on the state court record, and (2) if petitioner presents substantial new evidence in federal court in support of his claim, that makes it a new claim not subject to the deference standard...continue to full postFull post as published by Crime and Consequences on November 12, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Catholic Univ. Law Professor At SCOTUS Today
SCOTUS commentary on Exxon Valdez argument
Does SCOTUS Need a Math Geek on Staff
Constitutional Law II #30: More Tests and School Prayer
Constitutional Law II #31: Public Displays and Free Exercise
SCOTUS embraces criminal justice federalism in Danforth
Ind. Decisions - Still more on: SCOTUS to hear second Indiana case








